Who could have compromised the site to poison the executable PuTTY programs Way to know for sure who the signer was or what they signed - any attacker Signature, you do indeed get an RSA signature of something, but there is no Not to worry! Scroll down and note that Tatham offers links to RSA andĭSA cryptographic signatures of the binaries, e.g.Ĭurrently owned by Jonathan McDowell.Begin to doubt that this is the right site. Manually add the “ Note that the site does not respond to.Look for, and fail to find, the lock icon and the “ URL scheme.Īgain, shouldn’t cryptography and security software - like all software - beĭelivered always and only via an authenticated service?.Is that good? Actually, no only the hostname can indicate site Let’s follow the link to.Īhh, this has Tatham’s name right in the path part of the URL, so. Presumably just likes to domain-squat on other people’s product names and It’s currently owned by someone named “denis bider”, who No need to worry, though is not even owned by.It’s not there - worrying, considering that Tatham is supposedly an Unauthenticated malware, you check for the lock icon and the “ URL To get the good and true PuTTY that Simon Tatham wrote, and not some Your Linux machines, and all will be peachy. Now all you need is an SSH client so that you can connect to Microsoft, Lenovo, and any number of Lenovo’s business partners intended for
It during shipment, and thus that it comes only with the flaky goatware You’re pretty sure the NSA did not interdict Let’s say you have a brand-new Windows laptop and you’re just oh, so Respond to some questions this post may raise. Mastodon 🐘 Downloading Software Safely Is Nearly Impossible Downloading Software Safely Is Nearly Impossible Noncombatant 😚
0 kommentar(er)
